Skip to content
All insights

AI

Evaluating AI systems like production software

Governance, evaluation harnesses, and rollback paths — the bar for institutional AI is the same as any other production surface.

Elena Vasquez

Head of AI Practice

11 min read AI

Demos impress boards. Production impresses operators. The gap between them is evaluation — systematic, versioned, and tied to business risk rather than model vanity metrics.

Treat models as deployable artifacts

Every model version needs a changelog, a rollback path, and a harness that runs before promotion. We mirror CI/CD semantics: unit tests for deterministic components, integration tests for retrieval pipelines, and red-team suites for safety boundaries.

  • Define failure budgets for hallucination and latency regressions.
  • Log prompts and outputs with retention policies stakeholders can audit.
  • Separate experimentation sandboxes from production inference planes.

When evaluation is first-class, AI stops being a special case in architecture reviews — it becomes software with uncertainty bounds, which is exactly what institutions need to approve.

Newsletter

Notes that respect your inbox.

Occasional essays on architecture, delivery, and product craft — no growth theatre, no weekly noise.

We use your email only for this list. Future CMS sync will inherit the same privacy posture.